TY - JOUR
T1 - Best Practices for Optimization of Phytoplankton Analysis in Natural Waters Using CytoSense Flow Cytometers
AU - Gallot, Clémentine
AU - Hubert, Zéline
AU - Haraguchi, Lumi
AU - Aardema, Hedy
AU - Artigas, Luis Felipe
AU - Bellaaj Zouari, Amel
AU - Cauvin, Arnaud
AU - Casotti, Raffaella
AU - Créach, Véronique
AU - Dubelaar, Georges
AU - Epinoux, Alexandre
AU - Grégori, Gérald
AU - Grosso, Oliver
AU - Kolasinki, Joanna
AU - Kools, Harrie
AU - Lievaart, Rob
AU - Louchart, Arnaud P.
AU - Moreira Fragoso, Glaucia
AU - Palazot, Maialen
AU - Rijkeboer, Machteld
AU - Robache, Kévin
AU - Rolland, Joseph
AU - Rutten, Thomas
AU - Thyssen, Melilotus
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2025 The Author(s). Cytometry Part A published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of International Society for Advancement of Cytometry.
PY - 2025/10/16
Y1 - 2025/10/16
N2 - The use of flow cytometry to investigate phytoplankton functional groups is rapidly expanding worldwide, using lab- or ship-based instruments or autonomous environmental monitoring platforms. Automation, coupled with greater autonomy, allows for higher spatial and temporal resolution of phytoplankton groups, enhancing understanding of their dynamics and patterns, generating large datasets. The level of resolution is determined by both instrumental capabilities and optimization of its acquisition settings. Sharing these datasets with the scientific community, whether to improve global phytoplankton distribution resolution or facilitate the intercomparison of environmental indicators among monitoring laboratories, strongly relies on quality-controlled instruments and standardized data acquisition and analysis. This article focuses on CytoSense-type (CytoBuoy, NL) flow cytometers, which operate by recording the optical pulse shapes of particles as they pass through a laser beam. Different configurations such as laser wavelength and power, sheath fluid management, sample inlet design, and dataset output format were not considered, in order to focus on optimization and protocol standardization to resolve the whole phytoplankton size spectrum, from the smallest autofluorescing prokaryotes to colonies and chain-forming species. In this study, coincidence, PMT voltage, trigger threshold optimization, and regular quality control procedures are considered and discussed, using datasets from three types of instruments and two contrasted marine coastal waters as case studies. The primary goal of this study is to establish a framework to guide and support the exploration and application of this type of flow cytometer, ultimately achieving a reliable and optimal resolution for sample acquisition of natural waters.
AB - The use of flow cytometry to investigate phytoplankton functional groups is rapidly expanding worldwide, using lab- or ship-based instruments or autonomous environmental monitoring platforms. Automation, coupled with greater autonomy, allows for higher spatial and temporal resolution of phytoplankton groups, enhancing understanding of their dynamics and patterns, generating large datasets. The level of resolution is determined by both instrumental capabilities and optimization of its acquisition settings. Sharing these datasets with the scientific community, whether to improve global phytoplankton distribution resolution or facilitate the intercomparison of environmental indicators among monitoring laboratories, strongly relies on quality-controlled instruments and standardized data acquisition and analysis. This article focuses on CytoSense-type (CytoBuoy, NL) flow cytometers, which operate by recording the optical pulse shapes of particles as they pass through a laser beam. Different configurations such as laser wavelength and power, sheath fluid management, sample inlet design, and dataset output format were not considered, in order to focus on optimization and protocol standardization to resolve the whole phytoplankton size spectrum, from the smallest autofluorescing prokaryotes to colonies and chain-forming species. In this study, coincidence, PMT voltage, trigger threshold optimization, and regular quality control procedures are considered and discussed, using datasets from three types of instruments and two contrasted marine coastal waters as case studies. The primary goal of this study is to establish a framework to guide and support the exploration and application of this type of flow cytometer, ultimately achieving a reliable and optimal resolution for sample acquisition of natural waters.
KW - best practices
KW - coincidence risk
KW - CytoSense
KW - detection optimization
KW - flow cytometry
KW - phytoplankton
KW - quality control
KW - regular maintenance
U2 - 10.1002/cyto.a.24964
DO - 10.1002/cyto.a.24964
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:105019210324
SN - 1552-4922
JO - Cytometry Part A
JF - Cytometry Part A
ER -