Documents

DOI

  • Helmut Hillebrand (Corresponding author)
  • Bernd Blasius
  • Elizabeth T. Borer
  • Jonathan M. Chase
  • John Downing
  • Britas Klemens Eriksson
  • Christopher T. Filstrup
  • W. Stanley Harpole
  • Dorothee Hodapp
  • Stefano Larsen
  • Aleksandra M. Lewandowska
  • Eric W. Seabloom
  • Dedmer B. Van de Waal
  • Alexey B. Ryabov
* Global concern about human impact on biological diversity has triggered an intense research agenda on drivers and consequences of biodiversity change in parallel with international policy seeking to conserve biodiversity and associated ecosystem functions. Quantifying the trends in biodiversity is far from trivial however, as recently documented by meta-analyses, which report little if any net change of local species richness through time. * Here, we summarize several limitations of species richness as a metric of biodiversity change and show that the expectation of directional species richness trends under changing conditions is invalid. Instead, we illustrate how a set of species turnover indices provide more information content regarding temporal trends in biodiversity, as they reflect how dominance and identity shift in communities over time. * We apply these metrics to three monitoring data sets representing different ecosystem types. In all data sets, nearly complete species turnover occurred, but this was disconnected from any species richness trends. Instead, turnover was strongly influenced by changes in species presence (identities) and dominance (abundances). We further show that these metrics can detect phases of strong compositional shifts in monitoring data and thus identify a different aspect of biodiversity change decoupled from species richness. * Synthesis and applications: Temporal trends in species richness are insufficient to capture key changes in biodiversity in changing environments. In fact, reductions in environmental quality can lead to transient increases in species richness if immigration or extinction have different temporal dynamics. Thus, biodiversity monitoring programs need to go beyond analyses of trends in richness in favour of more meaningful assessments of biodiversity change. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)169-184
JournalJournal of Applied Ecology
Volume55
Issue number1
Early online date2017
DOI
StatePublished - 2018

    Research areas

  • biodiversity loss, diversity, dominance, richness, species composition, species turnover, time series, monitoring, human impact, biodiversity change, international

ID: 4313720