Comparative evaluation of Etest, EUCAST and CLSI methods for amphotericin B, voriconazole and posaconazol against clinically relevant Fusarium species

doi:10.1128/AAC.01671-16

Comparative evaluation of Etest, EUCAST and CLSI methods for amphotericin B, voriconazole and posaconazol against clinically relevant Fusarium species

Research output: Contribution to journal/periodical › Article › Scientific › peer-review

22 Citations (Scopus)

Original language	English
Journal	Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1128/AAC.01671-16
Publication status	Published - 2016

Access to Document

10.1128/AAC.01671-16

Cite this

@article{90743a517e964f97842b34fe468fe4cd,

title = "Comparative evaluation of Etest, EUCAST and CLSI methods for amphotericin B, voriconazole and posaconazol against clinically relevant Fusarium species",

author = "{de Hoog}, S.",

year = "2016",

doi = "10.1128/AAC.01671-16",

language = "English",

journal = "Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy",

issn = "0066-4804",

publisher = "American Society for Microbiology",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Comparative evaluation of Etest, EUCAST and CLSI methods for amphotericin B, voriconazole and posaconazol against clinically relevant Fusarium species

AU - de Hoog, S.

PY - 2016

Y1 - 2016

U2 - 10.1128/AAC.01671-16

DO - 10.1128/AAC.01671-16

M3 - Article

SN - 0066-4804

JO - Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy

JF - Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy

ER -