Comparison of Population Aging in Europe and Asia Using a Time-Consistent and Comparative Aging Measure

A. Balachandran, J.A.A. de Beer, K.S. James, L.J.G. van Wissen, F. Janssen

Research output: Contribution to journal/periodicalArticleScientificpeer-review

34 Citations (Scopus)


Objective: We compare population aging in Europe and Asia using a measure that is both consistent over time and appropriate for cross-country comparison. Method: Sanderson and Scherbov proposed to estimate the old-age threshold by the age at which the remaining life expectancy (RLE) equals 15 years. We propose an adjustment of this measure, taking into account cross-national differences in the exceptionality of reaching that age. Results: Our old-age threshold was lower than 65 years in 2012 in Central Asia, Southern Asia, Southeastern Asia, and many Eastern European countries. These populations also experienced a higher share of elderly compared with the RLE15 method. Our method revealed more geographical diversity in the shares of elderly. Both methods exhibited similar time trends for the old-age thresholds and the shares of elderly. Discussion: Our prospective and comparative measure reveals higher population aging estimates in most Asian and Eastern European countries and more diversity in aging.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)340-351
JournalJournal of Aging and Health
Issue number5-6
Early online date17 Jan 2019
Publication statusPublished - May 2020


  • population aging
  • characteristics approach
  • adult survival
  • Europe
  • Asia
  • SSCI


Dive into the research topics of 'Comparison of Population Aging in Europe and Asia Using a Time-Consistent and Comparative Aging Measure'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this