Comparison of the Photosynthetic Yield of Cyanobacteria and Green Algae: Different Methods Give Different Answers

R. Milou Schuurmans, Pascal van Alphen, J. Merijn Schuurmans, Hans C. P. Matthijs, Klaas J. Hellingwerf

Research output: Contribution to journal/periodicalArticleScientificpeer-review

199 Downloads (Pure)


The societal importance of renewable carbon-based commodities and energy carriers has elicited a particular interest for high performance phototrophic microorganisms. Selection of optimal strains is often based on direct comparison under laboratory conditions of maximal growth rate or additional valued features such as lipid content. Instead of reporting growth rate in culture, estimation of photosynthetic efficiency (quantum yield of PSII) by pulse-amplitude modulated (PAM) fluorimetry is an often applied alternative method. Here we compared the quantum yield of PSII and the photonic yield on biomass for the green alga Chlorella sorokiniana 211-8K and the cyanobacterium Synechocystis sp. PCC 6803. Our data demonstrate that the PAM technique inherently underestimates the photosynthetic efficiency of cyanobacteria by rendering a high F-0 and a low F-M, specifically after the commonly practiced dark pre-incubation before a yield measurement. Yet when comparing the calculated biomass yield on light in continuous culture experiments, we obtained nearly equal values for both species. Using mutants of Synechocystis sp. PCC 6803, we analyzed the factors that compromise its PAM-based quantum yield measurements. We will discuss the role of dark respiratory activity, fluorescence emission from the phycobilisomes, and the Mehler-like reaction. Based on the above observations we recommend that PAM measurements in cyanobacteria are interpreted only qualitatively.
Original languageEnglish
Article numbere0139061
JournalPLoS One
Issue number9
Publication statusPublished - 22 Sept 2015


  • national


Dive into the research topics of 'Comparison of the Photosynthetic Yield of Cyanobacteria and Green Algae: Different Methods Give Different Answers'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this