Disclosure of individual genetic data to research participants: the debate reconsidered

A.L. Bredenoord, H.Y. Kroes, E. Cuppen, M. Parker, J.J.M. van Delden

Research output: Contribution to journal/periodicalArticleScientificpeer-review

174 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Despite extensive debate, there is no consensus on whether individual genetic data should be disclosed to research participants. The emergence of whole-genome sequencing methods is increasingly generating unequalled amounts of genetic data, making the need for a clear feedback policy even more urgent. In this debate two positions can be broadly discerned: a restrictive disclosure policy ('no feedback except life-saving data') and an intermediate policy of qualified disclosure ('feedback if the results meet certain conditions'). We explain both positions and present the principal underlying arguments. We suggest that the debate should no longer address whether genetic research results should be returned, but instead how best to make an appropriate selection and how to strike a balance between the possible benefits of disclosure and the harms of unduly hindering biomedical research.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)41-47
JournalTrends in Genetics
Volume27
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2010

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Disclosure of individual genetic data to research participants: the debate reconsidered'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this