Duch is dead. [Review of: Laban Hinton (2016) Man or Monster? The Trial of a Khmer Rouge Torturer.]

Research output: Contribution to journal/periodicalBook/Film/Article reviewScientific

Abstract

In his stimulating new book, the psychological anthropologist Alexander Laban Hinton chronicles the trial against the confessant Cambodian tormenter Kaing Guek Eav (f.k.a. Comrade Duch). In exploring Kaing Guek Eav’s state of mind, the book provokes the reader to think about why we feel the need to ask the black-and-white question whether he was a man or a monster under the Khmer Rouge regime. “What does this say about ourselves, our own belief systems, the banality of our everyday thought, and the moral economies we circulate?” (270). Rather than editing out complicating detail in favour of abstract truth, Man or Monster?further delicately complicates, enhances but also confines our ability to know and understand perpetrators of mass violence.
Original languageEnglish
Article number7
Pages (from-to)110-114
Number of pages5
JournalJournal of Perpetrator Research
Volume1
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 12 Dec 2017

Keywords

  • Duch
  • Cambodia
  • ECCC
  • Transitional Justice

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Duch is dead. [Review of: Laban Hinton (2016) Man or Monster? The Trial of a Khmer Rouge Torturer.]'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this