Early Public Responses to the Zika-Virus on YouTube: Prevalence of and Differences Between Conspiracy Theory and Informational Videos

A. Nerghes, Peter Kerkhof, Iina Helsten

Research output: Chapter in book/volumeContribution to conference proceedingsScientificpeer-review

13 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

In this paper, we analyze the content of the most popular videos posted on YouTube in the first phase of the Zika-virus outbreak in 2016, and the user responses to those videos. More specifically, we examine the extent to which informational and conspiracy theory videos differ in terms of user activity (number of comments, shares, likes and dislikes), and the sentiment and content of the user responses. Our results show that 12 out of the 35 videos in our data set focused on conspiracy theories, but no statistical differences were found in the number of user activity and sentiment between the two types of videos. The content of the user responses shows that users respond differently to sub-topics related to Zika-virus. The implications of the results for future online health promotion campaigns are discussed.
Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationProceedings of the 10th ACM Conference on Web Science
Place of PublicationNew York, NY, USA
PublisherAssociation for Computing Machinery (ACM)
Pages127-134
Number of pages8
ISBN (Electronic)978-1-4503-5563-6
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 15 May 2018

Keywords

  • Zika-virus
  • YouTube
  • Informational and Conspiracy Theory Videos
  • topic modeling
  • Semantic networks

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Early Public Responses to the Zika-Virus on YouTube: Prevalence of and Differences Between Conspiracy Theory and Informational Videos'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this