Evidence for local adaptation in neighbouring Daphnia populations: a laboratory transplant experiment

S. DeClerck, C. Cousyn, Luc De Meester

Research output: Contribution to journal/periodicalArticleScientificpeer-review

32 Citations (Scopus)


1. We tested whether two neighbouring Daphnia galeata populations (from Lake Blankaart and Fish Pond), separated only by 5 m of land and with the occasional exchange of water were genetically differentiated in allozyme markers and life history traits. Allozyme electrophoresis revealed that the populations differed in allelic as well as in genotypic composition. 2. In a laboratory transplant experiment, in which animals of four clones of each of the populations were raised in the water of both ponds, survival in Blankaart water was high for both the Blankaart and Fish Pond clones, whereas survival in Fish Pond water was high for the Fish Pond clones, but low for the Blankaart clones. 3. Fish Pond clones produced fewer neonates than Blankaart clones when cultured in Blankaart water. High egg mortality was observed for animals that were raised in Blankaart water, and this egg mortality was higher for Fish Pond clones than for Blankaart clones. 4. Our results provide evidence for genetic differentiation between Daphnia populations inhabiting neighbouring water bodies and suggest local adaptation to environmental conditions other than direct predation.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)187-198
Number of pages12
JournalFreshwater Biology
Issue number2
Publication statusPublished - 2001
Externally publishedYes


  • Daphnia egg mortality genetic differentiation life history local adaptation life-history evolution genetic differentiation natural-populations magna crustacea cyclical parthenogen toxic cyanobacteria enzyme variability clonal ecology cladocera pulex Environmental Sciences & Ecology Marine & Freshwater Biology


Dive into the research topics of 'Evidence for local adaptation in neighbouring Daphnia populations: a laboratory transplant experiment'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this