Genome evolution of asexual organisms and the paradox of sex in eukaryotes

Elvira Hörandl; Jens Bast; Alexander Brandt; Stefan Scheu; Christoph Bleidorn; Mathilde Cordellier; Minou Nowrousian; Dominik Begerow; Anja Sturm; Koen Verhoeven; Jens Boenigk; Thomas Friedl; Micah Dunthorn

doi:10.1007/978-3-030-57246-4_7

Genome evolution of asexual organisms and the paradox of sex in eukaryotes

Elvira Hörandl^*, Jens Bast, Alexander Brandt, Stefan Scheu, Christoph Bleidorn, Mathilde Cordellier, Minou Nowrousian, Dominik Begerow, Anja Sturm, Koen Verhoeven, Jens Boenigk, Thomas Friedl, Micah Dunthorn

^*Corresponding author for this work

NIOO - Terrestrial Ecology (TE)

Research output: Chapter in book/volume › Chapter › Scientific › peer-review

19 Citations (Scopus)

12 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

The predominance of sex in eukaryotes is still enigmatic. Sex, a composed process of meiosis and mixis cycles, confers high costs but the selective advantages remain unclear. In this review, we focus on potentially detrimental effects of asexuality on genome evolution. Theory predicts that asexual lineages should suffer from lack of meiotic DNA repair, accumulation of deleterious mutations, proliferation of transposable elements, among others. Here, we compare the different genomic features, life cycles, developmental pathways, and cytological mechanisms in the major eukaryotic groups, i.e., in protists, animals, fungi, and plants. In general, it is difficult to disentangle lineage-specific features from general features of asexuality. In all groups, forms of asexuality are predominantly facultative or cyclical. A variety of mixed or partial sexual developmental pathways exists, maintaining some components of sexuality, while obligate asexuality appears to be rare in eukaryotes. The strongest theoretical prediction for negative consequences of asexuality is decreased effectiveness of selection compared to sexuality. While some studies have shown increased rates of mutation accumulation in asexuals, others using whole-genome comparisons did not find this pattern. Various mechanisms exist that can alleviate the negative consequences of accumulation of negative mutations. More empirical data are needed to understand comprehensively the role of genome evolution for the maintenance of sex.

Original language	English
Title of host publication	Evolutionary Biology-A Transdisciplinary Approach
Publisher	Springer
Pages	133-167
Number of pages	35
ISBN (Electronic)	9783030572464
ISBN (Print)	9783030572457
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-57246-4_7
Publication status	Published - 29 Oct 2020

Access to Document

10.1007/978-3-030-57246-4_7

Hörandl et al 2020Final published version, 449 KBLicence: Taverne

Cite this

Hörandl, E., Bast, J., Brandt, A., Scheu, S., Bleidorn, C., Cordellier, M., Nowrousian, M., Begerow, D., Sturm, A., Verhoeven, K., Boenigk, J., Friedl, T., & Dunthorn, M. (2020). Genome evolution of asexual organisms and the paradox of sex in eukaryotes. In Evolutionary Biology-A Transdisciplinary Approach (pp. 133-167). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-57246-4_7

@inbook{77a99ff5268149cdb093d2529c3f00b1,

title = "Genome evolution of asexual organisms and the paradox of sex in eukaryotes",

abstract = "The predominance of sex in eukaryotes is still enigmatic. Sex, a composed process of meiosis and mixis cycles, confers high costs but the selective advantages remain unclear. In this review, we focus on potentially detrimental effects of asexuality on genome evolution. Theory predicts that asexual lineages should suffer from lack of meiotic DNA repair, accumulation of deleterious mutations, proliferation of transposable elements, among others. Here, we compare the different genomic features, life cycles, developmental pathways, and cytological mechanisms in the major eukaryotic groups, i.e., in protists, animals, fungi, and plants. In general, it is difficult to disentangle lineage-specific features from general features of asexuality. In all groups, forms of asexuality are predominantly facultative or cyclical. A variety of mixed or partial sexual developmental pathways exists, maintaining some components of sexuality, while obligate asexuality appears to be rare in eukaryotes. The strongest theoretical prediction for negative consequences of asexuality is decreased effectiveness of selection compared to sexuality. While some studies have shown increased rates of mutation accumulation in asexuals, others using whole-genome comparisons did not find this pattern. Various mechanisms exist that can alleviate the negative consequences of accumulation of negative mutations. More empirical data are needed to understand comprehensively the role of genome evolution for the maintenance of sex.",

author = "Elvira H{\"o}randl and Jens Bast and Alexander Brandt and Stefan Scheu and Christoph Bleidorn and Mathilde Cordellier and Minou Nowrousian and Dominik Begerow and Anja Sturm and Koen Verhoeven and Jens Boenigk and Thomas Friedl and Micah Dunthorn",

year = "2020",

month = oct,

day = "29",

doi = "10.1007/978-3-030-57246-4_7",

language = "English",

isbn = "9783030572457",

pages = "133--167",

booktitle = "Evolutionary Biology-A Transdisciplinary Approach",

publisher = "Springer",

address = "Germany",

}

TY - CHAP

T1 - Genome evolution of asexual organisms and the paradox of sex in eukaryotes

AU - Hörandl, Elvira

AU - Bast, Jens

AU - Brandt, Alexander

AU - Scheu, Stefan

AU - Bleidorn, Christoph

AU - Cordellier, Mathilde

AU - Nowrousian, Minou

AU - Begerow, Dominik

AU - Sturm, Anja

AU - Verhoeven, Koen

AU - Boenigk, Jens

AU - Friedl, Thomas

AU - Dunthorn, Micah

PY - 2020/10/29

Y1 - 2020/10/29

N2 - The predominance of sex in eukaryotes is still enigmatic. Sex, a composed process of meiosis and mixis cycles, confers high costs but the selective advantages remain unclear. In this review, we focus on potentially detrimental effects of asexuality on genome evolution. Theory predicts that asexual lineages should suffer from lack of meiotic DNA repair, accumulation of deleterious mutations, proliferation of transposable elements, among others. Here, we compare the different genomic features, life cycles, developmental pathways, and cytological mechanisms in the major eukaryotic groups, i.e., in protists, animals, fungi, and plants. In general, it is difficult to disentangle lineage-specific features from general features of asexuality. In all groups, forms of asexuality are predominantly facultative or cyclical. A variety of mixed or partial sexual developmental pathways exists, maintaining some components of sexuality, while obligate asexuality appears to be rare in eukaryotes. The strongest theoretical prediction for negative consequences of asexuality is decreased effectiveness of selection compared to sexuality. While some studies have shown increased rates of mutation accumulation in asexuals, others using whole-genome comparisons did not find this pattern. Various mechanisms exist that can alleviate the negative consequences of accumulation of negative mutations. More empirical data are needed to understand comprehensively the role of genome evolution for the maintenance of sex.

AB - The predominance of sex in eukaryotes is still enigmatic. Sex, a composed process of meiosis and mixis cycles, confers high costs but the selective advantages remain unclear. In this review, we focus on potentially detrimental effects of asexuality on genome evolution. Theory predicts that asexual lineages should suffer from lack of meiotic DNA repair, accumulation of deleterious mutations, proliferation of transposable elements, among others. Here, we compare the different genomic features, life cycles, developmental pathways, and cytological mechanisms in the major eukaryotic groups, i.e., in protists, animals, fungi, and plants. In general, it is difficult to disentangle lineage-specific features from general features of asexuality. In all groups, forms of asexuality are predominantly facultative or cyclical. A variety of mixed or partial sexual developmental pathways exists, maintaining some components of sexuality, while obligate asexuality appears to be rare in eukaryotes. The strongest theoretical prediction for negative consequences of asexuality is decreased effectiveness of selection compared to sexuality. While some studies have shown increased rates of mutation accumulation in asexuals, others using whole-genome comparisons did not find this pattern. Various mechanisms exist that can alleviate the negative consequences of accumulation of negative mutations. More empirical data are needed to understand comprehensively the role of genome evolution for the maintenance of sex.

U2 - 10.1007/978-3-030-57246-4_7

DO - 10.1007/978-3-030-57246-4_7

M3 - Chapter

AN - SCOPUS:85100285285

SN - 9783030572457

SP - 133

EP - 167

BT - Evolutionary Biology-A Transdisciplinary Approach

PB - Springer

ER -