Mapping the Literature on Job Evaluation: A Scoping Review

Irene van de Glind, Roos Mulder, Agnes Akkerman*, Mieke van der Biezen, Jael Bootsma, Evelyn Finnema, Lex Heerma van Voss, Niek Mouter, Jos van Rooij, Geertje van de Ven

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journal/periodicalArticleScientificpeer-review

Abstract

Since the 1940’s, job evaluation methods are being used to establish the relative value of jobs within organizations in order to determine salaries. Job evaluation methods have been studied, but there has not been much systematic reflection on the research conducted so far. This scoping review of 199 articles demonstrates that topics changed over decades, starting with methodological questions in the 1940’s, reflecting a start-up period. Historic overviews on wage policies appeared in the 1960’s, and the topic of gender wage inequality in the 1980’s. Guidelines were published in the 1990’s. From 2000 onwards, the main topic was adapting job evaluation methods to specific contexts. Research declined since 2010. There was hardly any research on appending changes in job evaluation methods and criteria. Given the ever-changing nature of work and the upcoming demographic changes, we recommend to revive scientific research on job evaluation and propose an agenda with research questions.

Original languageEnglish
JournalCompensation and Benefits Review
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2024

Keywords

  • job evaluation
  • job grading
  • job levelling
  • renumeration
  • reward management
  • scoping review
  • wage differences

Cite this