Not anything goes: On implicational coherence and the penalty for being incoherent

TY - CHAP

T1 - Not anything goes

T2 - On implicational coherence and the penalty for being incoherent

AU - Ghyselen, Anne-Sophie

AU - Grondelaers, Stef

PY - 2022

Y1 - 2022

N2 - In this chapter, we revisit the concept of coherence by focusing on a colloquial variety of Belgian Dutch, which is often seen as incoherent by virtue of its being situated in-between the standard and the regional dialects – hence its name tussentaal. In spite of tussentaal’s mixed nature, we argue that there are implicational restrictions on its production, which are crucially reflected in cognition. A perception experiment featuring implicationally (in)coherent spoken Belgian Dutch (ranging from dialect to near standard) revealed that native speakers noticed and penalized incoherence, though not on the samples’ prestige attributes but on the open response evaluations. In view of these findings, we propose that (in)coherence is not only a production feature but just as much, if not more, a perceptual reality.

AB - In this chapter, we revisit the concept of coherence by focusing on a colloquial variety of Belgian Dutch, which is often seen as incoherent by virtue of its being situated in-between the standard and the regional dialects – hence its name tussentaal. In spite of tussentaal’s mixed nature, we argue that there are implicational restrictions on its production, which are crucially reflected in cognition. A perception experiment featuring implicationally (in)coherent spoken Belgian Dutch (ranging from dialect to near standard) revealed that native speakers noticed and penalized incoherence, though not on the samples’ prestige attributes but on the open response evaluations. In view of these findings, we propose that (in)coherence is not only a production feature but just as much, if not more, a perceptual reality.

M3 - Chapter

SP - 203

EP - 220

BT - The Coherence of Linguistic Communities

PB - Routledge

CY - New York

ER -