TY - JOUR
T1 - Pair-wise regulation of convergence and extension cell movements by four phosphatases via RhoA
AU - van Eekelen, M.
AU - Runtuwene, V.
AU - Masselink, W.
AU - den Hertog, J.
N1 - Reporting year: 2012
PY - 2012
Y1 - 2012
N2 - Various signaling pathways regulate shaping of the main body axis during early vertebrate development. Here, we focused on the role of protein-tyrosine phosphatase signaling in convergence and extension cell movements. We identified Ptpn20 as a structural paralogue of PTP-BL and both phosphatases were required for normal gastrulation cell movements. Interestingly, knockdowns of PTP-BL and Ptpn20 evoked similar developmental defects as knockdown of RPTPalpha and PTPepsilon. Co-knockdown of RPTPalpha and PTP-BL, but not Ptpn20, had synergistic effects and conversely, PTPepsilon and Ptpn20, but not PTP-BL, cooperated, demonstrating the specificity of our approach. RPTPalpha and PTPepsilon knockdowns were rescued by constitutively active RhoA, whereas PTP-BL and Ptpn20 knockdowns were rescued by dominant negative RhoA. Consistently, RPTPalpha and PTP-BL had opposite effects on RhoA activation, both in a PTP-dependent manner. Downstream of the PTPs, we identified NGEF and Arhgap29, regulating RhoA activation and inactivation, respectively, in convergence and extension cell movements. We propose a model in which two phosphatases activate RhoA and two phosphatases inhibit RhoA, resulting in proper cell polarization and normal convergence and extension cell movements.
AB - Various signaling pathways regulate shaping of the main body axis during early vertebrate development. Here, we focused on the role of protein-tyrosine phosphatase signaling in convergence and extension cell movements. We identified Ptpn20 as a structural paralogue of PTP-BL and both phosphatases were required for normal gastrulation cell movements. Interestingly, knockdowns of PTP-BL and Ptpn20 evoked similar developmental defects as knockdown of RPTPalpha and PTPepsilon. Co-knockdown of RPTPalpha and PTP-BL, but not Ptpn20, had synergistic effects and conversely, PTPepsilon and Ptpn20, but not PTP-BL, cooperated, demonstrating the specificity of our approach. RPTPalpha and PTPepsilon knockdowns were rescued by constitutively active RhoA, whereas PTP-BL and Ptpn20 knockdowns were rescued by dominant negative RhoA. Consistently, RPTPalpha and PTP-BL had opposite effects on RhoA activation, both in a PTP-dependent manner. Downstream of the PTPs, we identified NGEF and Arhgap29, regulating RhoA activation and inactivation, respectively, in convergence and extension cell movements. We propose a model in which two phosphatases activate RhoA and two phosphatases inhibit RhoA, resulting in proper cell polarization and normal convergence and extension cell movements.
U2 - 10.1371/journal.pone.0035913
DO - 10.1371/journal.pone.0035913
M3 - Article
SN - 1932-6203
VL - 7
SP - 35913
JO - PLoS One
JF - PLoS One
IS - 4
ER -