Documents

  • 6136_Poorter

    Final published version, 819 KB, PDF-document

    Request copy

  • 6136_Poorter_Online

    817 KB, PDF-document

    Request copy

DOI

  • H. Poorter
  • F. Fiorani
  • R. Pieruschka
  • T. Wojciechowski
  • W.H. van der Putten
  • M. Kleyer
  • U. Schurr
  • J. Postma
Plant biologists often grow plants in growth chambers or glasshouses with the ultimate aim to understand or improve plant performance in the field. What is often overlooked is how results from controlled conditions translate back to field situations. A meta-analysis showed that lab-grown plants had faster growth rates, higher nitrogen concentrations and different morphology. They remained smaller, however, because the lab plants had grown for a much shorter time. We compared glasshouse and growth chamber conditions with those in the field and found that the ratio between the daily amount of light and daily temperature (photothermal ratio) was consistently lower under controlled conditions. This may strongly affect a plant's source : sink ratio and hence its overall morphology and physiology. Plants in the field also grow at higher plant densities. A second meta-analysis showed that a doubling in density leads on average to 34% smaller plants with strong negative effects on tiller or side-shoot formation but little effect on plant height. We found the r2 between lab and field phenotypic data to be rather modest (0.26). Based on these insights, we discuss various alternatives to facilitate the translation from lab results to the field, including several options to apply growth regimes closer to field conditions.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)838-855
JournalNew Phytologist
Volume212
Issue number4
Early online date01 Jan 2016
DOI
StatePublished - 2016

    Research areas

  • international

ID: 2254315