Altered rainfall regimes will greatly affect the response of plant species to climate change. However, little is known about how direct effects of changing precipitation on plant performance may depend on other abiotic factors and biotic interactions. We used reciprocal transplants between climatically very different sites with simultaneous manipulation of soil, plant population origin, and neighbor conditions to evaluate local adaptation and possible adaptive response of four Eastern Mediterranean annual plant species to climate change. The effect of site on plant performance was negligible, but soil origin had a strong effect on fecundity, most likely due to differential water retaining ability. Competition by neighbors strongly reduced fitness.
We separated the effects of the abiotic and biotic soil properties on plant performance by repeating the field experiment in a greenhouse under homogenous environmental conditions and including a soil biota manipulation treatment. As in the field, plant performance differed among soil origins and neighbor treatments. Moreover, we found plant species-specific responses to soil biota that may be best explained by the differential sensitivity to negative and positive soil biota effects. Overall, under the conditions of our experiment with two contrasting sites, biotic interactions had a strong effect on plant fitness that interacted with and eventually overrode climate. Because climate and biotic interactions covary, reciprocal transplants and climate gradient studies should consider soil biotic interactions and abiotic conditions when evaluating climate change effects on plant performance.
Read More: http://www.esajournals.org/doi/10.1890/14-1445.1
Separating the role of biotic interactions and climate in determining adaptive response of plants to climate change
Tomiolo, S. (Creator), van der Putten, W. H. (Creator) & Tielbörger, K. (Creator), Figshare, 10 Aug 2016
Tomiolo, S., Van der Putten, W., & Tielborger, K. (2015). Separating the role of biotic interactions and climate in determining adaptive response of plants to climate change. Ecology, 96(5), 1298-1308. https://doi.org/10.1890/14-1445.1