Standard

Soil feedback effects to the foredune grass Ammophila arenaria by endoparasitic root-feeding nematodes and whole soil communities. / Brinkman, E.P.; Troelstra, S.R.; Van der Putten, W.H.

In: Soil Biology & Biochemistry, Vol. 37, No. 11, 2005, p. 2077-2087.

Research output: Scientific - peer-reviewArticle

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Author

Brinkman, E.P.; Troelstra, S.R.; Van der Putten, W.H. / Soil feedback effects to the foredune grass Ammophila arenaria by endoparasitic root-feeding nematodes and whole soil communities.

In: Soil Biology & Biochemistry, Vol. 37, No. 11, 2005, p. 2077-2087.

Research output: Scientific - peer-reviewArticle

BibTeX

@article{77c2186930e345bb843d33ee839282c8,
title = "Soil feedback effects to the foredune grass Ammophila arenaria by endoparasitic root-feeding nematodes and whole soil communities",
abstract = "In coastal foredunes, the grass Ammophila arenaria develops a soil community that contributes to die-back and replacement by later successional plant species. Root-feeding nematodes and pathogenic soil microorganisms are involved in this negative feedback. Regular burial by wind-blown beach sand results in vigorous growth of A. arenaria, probably because of enabling a temporary escape from negative soil feedback. Here, we examine the role of root-feeding nematodes as compared to the whole soil community in causing negative feedback to A. arenaria. We performed a 3-year sand burial experiment in the field and every year we determined the feedback of different soil communities to plant growth in growth chamber bioassays. In the field, we established A. arenaria in tubes with beach sand, added three endoparasitic root-feeding nematode species (Meloidogyne maritima, Heterodera arenaria and Pratylenchus penetrans) or root zone soil to the plants, and created series of ceased and continued sand burial. During three subsequent years, plant biomass was measured and numbers of nematodes were counted. Every year, bioassays were performed with the field soils and biomass of seed-grown A. arenaria plants was measured to d In the field, addition of root zone soil had a negative effect on biomass of buried plants. In the bioassays, addition of root zone soil also reduced the biomass of newly planted seedlings, however, only in the case when the field plants had not been buried with beach sand. Addition of the three endoparasitic root-feeding nematodes did not influence plant biomass in the field and in the bioassays. Our results strongly suggest that the negative feedback to A. arenaria is not due to the combinatio [KEYWORDS: Heterodera arenaria ; Meloidogyne maritima ; Pratylenchus penetrans ; Root-feeding nematode ; Soil community ; Soil pathogen]",
author = "E.P. Brinkman and S.R. Troelstra and {Van der Putten}, W.H.",
note = "Reporting year: 2005 Metis note: 3553; CTE; MTI ; TME ; TE; file:///L:/Endnotedatabases/NIOOPUB/pdfs/Pdfs2005/Brinkman_ea_3553.pdf",
year = "2005",
doi = "10.1016/j.soilbio.2005.03.011",
volume = "37",
pages = "2077--2087",
journal = "Soil Biology and Biochemistry",
issn = "0038-0717",
publisher = "Elsevier",
number = "11",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Soil feedback effects to the foredune grass Ammophila arenaria by endoparasitic root-feeding nematodes and whole soil communities

AU - Brinkman,E.P.

AU - Troelstra,S.R.

AU - Van der Putten,W.H.

N1 - Reporting year: 2005 Metis note: 3553; CTE; MTI ; TME ; TE; file:///L:/Endnotedatabases/NIOOPUB/pdfs/Pdfs2005/Brinkman_ea_3553.pdf

PY - 2005

Y1 - 2005

N2 - In coastal foredunes, the grass Ammophila arenaria develops a soil community that contributes to die-back and replacement by later successional plant species. Root-feeding nematodes and pathogenic soil microorganisms are involved in this negative feedback. Regular burial by wind-blown beach sand results in vigorous growth of A. arenaria, probably because of enabling a temporary escape from negative soil feedback. Here, we examine the role of root-feeding nematodes as compared to the whole soil community in causing negative feedback to A. arenaria. We performed a 3-year sand burial experiment in the field and every year we determined the feedback of different soil communities to plant growth in growth chamber bioassays. In the field, we established A. arenaria in tubes with beach sand, added three endoparasitic root-feeding nematode species (Meloidogyne maritima, Heterodera arenaria and Pratylenchus penetrans) or root zone soil to the plants, and created series of ceased and continued sand burial. During three subsequent years, plant biomass was measured and numbers of nematodes were counted. Every year, bioassays were performed with the field soils and biomass of seed-grown A. arenaria plants was measured to d In the field, addition of root zone soil had a negative effect on biomass of buried plants. In the bioassays, addition of root zone soil also reduced the biomass of newly planted seedlings, however, only in the case when the field plants had not been buried with beach sand. Addition of the three endoparasitic root-feeding nematodes did not influence plant biomass in the field and in the bioassays. Our results strongly suggest that the negative feedback to A. arenaria is not due to the combinatio [KEYWORDS: Heterodera arenaria ; Meloidogyne maritima ; Pratylenchus penetrans ; Root-feeding nematode ; Soil community ; Soil pathogen]

AB - In coastal foredunes, the grass Ammophila arenaria develops a soil community that contributes to die-back and replacement by later successional plant species. Root-feeding nematodes and pathogenic soil microorganisms are involved in this negative feedback. Regular burial by wind-blown beach sand results in vigorous growth of A. arenaria, probably because of enabling a temporary escape from negative soil feedback. Here, we examine the role of root-feeding nematodes as compared to the whole soil community in causing negative feedback to A. arenaria. We performed a 3-year sand burial experiment in the field and every year we determined the feedback of different soil communities to plant growth in growth chamber bioassays. In the field, we established A. arenaria in tubes with beach sand, added three endoparasitic root-feeding nematode species (Meloidogyne maritima, Heterodera arenaria and Pratylenchus penetrans) or root zone soil to the plants, and created series of ceased and continued sand burial. During three subsequent years, plant biomass was measured and numbers of nematodes were counted. Every year, bioassays were performed with the field soils and biomass of seed-grown A. arenaria plants was measured to d In the field, addition of root zone soil had a negative effect on biomass of buried plants. In the bioassays, addition of root zone soil also reduced the biomass of newly planted seedlings, however, only in the case when the field plants had not been buried with beach sand. Addition of the three endoparasitic root-feeding nematodes did not influence plant biomass in the field and in the bioassays. Our results strongly suggest that the negative feedback to A. arenaria is not due to the combinatio [KEYWORDS: Heterodera arenaria ; Meloidogyne maritima ; Pratylenchus penetrans ; Root-feeding nematode ; Soil community ; Soil pathogen]

U2 - 10.1016/j.soilbio.2005.03.011

DO - 10.1016/j.soilbio.2005.03.011

M3 - Article

VL - 37

SP - 2077

EP - 2087

JO - Soil Biology and Biochemistry

T2 - Soil Biology and Biochemistry

JF - Soil Biology and Biochemistry

SN - 0038-0717

IS - 11

ER -

ID: 225785