Stroking or Buzzing? A Comparison of Somatosensory Touch Stimuli Using 7 Tesla fMRI

W. Van der Zwaag, Rolf Gruetter, Roberto Martuzzi

Research output: Contribution to journal/periodicalArticleScientificpeer-review

11 Citations (Scopus)
197 Downloads (Pure)


Studying body representations in the brain helps us to understand how we humans relate to our own bodies. The in vivo mapping of the somatosensory cortex, where these representations are found, is greatly facilitated by the high spatial resolution and high sensitivity to brain activation available at ultra-high field. In this study, the use of different stimulus types for somatotopic mapping of the digits at ultra-high field, specifically manual stroking and mechanical stimulation, was compared in terms of sensitivity and specificity of the brain responses. Larger positive responses in digit regions of interest were found for manual stroking than for mechanical stimulation, both in terms of average and maximum t-value and in terms of number of voxels with significant responses to the tactile stimulation. Responses to manual stroking were higher throughout the entire post-central sulcus, but the difference was especially large on its posterior wall, i.e. in Brodmann area 2. During mechanical stimulation, cross-digit responses were more negative than during manual stroking, possibly caused by a faster habituation to the stimulus. These differences indicate that manual stroking is a highly suitable stimulus for fast somatotopic mapping procedures, especially if Brodmann area 2 is of interest.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)e0134610
JournalPLoS One
Issue number8
Publication statusPublished - 2015


  • Adult
  • Brain Mapping
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Magnetic Resonance Imaging
  • Male
  • Mechanical Processes
  • Physical Stimulation
  • Somatosensory Cortex
  • Time Factors
  • Touch Perception
  • Young Adult
  • Comparative Study
  • Journal Article
  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't


Dive into the research topics of 'Stroking or Buzzing? A Comparison of Somatosensory Touch Stimuli Using 7 Tesla fMRI'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this