The conclusions of Clemson et al. Concerning valproic acid are premature.

M.J. Van Schooneveld, L.I. Van den Born, M.M. Van Genderen, J.G. Bollemeijer

Research output: Contribution to journal/periodical › Article › Scientific › peer-review

Original language	English
Pages (from-to)	153
Journal	British Journal of Ophthalmology
Volume	95
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1136/bjo.2010.194373
Publication status	Published - 2011

Access to Document

@article{334629ce96f94b5c8854a95cfabd8b02,

title = "The conclusions of Clemson et al. Concerning valproic acid are premature.",

author = "{Van Schooneveld}, M.J. and {Van den Born}, L.I. and {Van Genderen}, M.M. and J.G. Bollemeijer",

note = "Reporting year: 2011",

year = "2011",

doi = "10.1136/bjo.2010.194373",

language = "English",

volume = "95",

pages = "153",

journal = "British Journal of Ophthalmology",

issn = "0007-1161",

publisher = "BMJ Publishing Group",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The conclusions of Clemson et al. Concerning valproic acid are premature.

AU - Van Schooneveld, M.J.

AU - Van den Born, L.I.

AU - Van Genderen, M.M.

AU - Bollemeijer, J.G.

N1 - Reporting year: 2011

PY - 2011

Y1 - 2011

U2 - 10.1136/bjo.2010.194373

DO - 10.1136/bjo.2010.194373

M3 - Article

VL - 95

SP - 153

JO - British Journal of Ophthalmology

JF - British Journal of Ophthalmology

SN - 0007-1161

ER -