The rise in life expectancy – corresponding rise in subjective life expectancy? Changes over the period 1999-2016

F. Janssen, D. Deeg, M. van der Noordt, N. Sant, H. Galenkamp, M. Huisman

Research output: Working paper/discussion paperWorking paper/Discussion paperScientific

40 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

We test the hypothesis that subjective remaining life expectancy (SRLE) increased
concomitantly with the rise in actuarial remaining life expectancy (ARLE) over the
period 1999-2016. As earlier evidence shows the relevance of SRLE for the intention of older workers to continue working, we focus on people aged 64-67 years. We also examine the influence of personal characteristics on the trend in SRLE. We select data from six measurement waves (n=1,967 observations) of the Longitudinal Aging Study Amsterdam, which is representative for people aged 55 and over in the Netherlands.
SRLE is derived from a ‘lifeline’ on which participants indicated where they stood in life at the moment of participation. We find no change over time in SRLE for men; for women, in contrast, we find a significant increase in SRLE, greater than the increase in ARLE. Among the personal characteristics, a poorer self-rated health (men), chronic diseases (women), and, unexpectedly, a higher level of education and better cognitive functioning (both genders) are associated with a shorter SRLE. For women, preference for a fixed retirement age of 65 or lower is associated with a longer SRLE. We discuss implications for the willingness of people aged 64-67 to extend working life.
Original languageEnglish
PublisherNetwork for Studies on Pensions, Aging and Retirement (NETSPAR)
Number of pages16
Publication statusPublished - Jun 2019

Publication series

NameNetspar Design Papers
No.DP 122

Keywords

  • levensverwachting
  • life expectancy
  • Subjective life expectancy

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The rise in life expectancy – corresponding rise in subjective life expectancy? Changes over the period 1999-2016'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this