• PDF

    Final published version, 142 KB, PDF-document

    Request copy


carrying capacity of suspension feeding bivalves in 11 coastal and estuarine ecosystems is examined. Bivalve carrying capacity is defined in terms of water mass residence time, primary production time and bivalve clearance time. Turnover times for the 11 ecosystems are compared both two and three dimensionally. Fast systems, e.g., Sylt and North Inlet, have turnover times of days or less, while, slow systems, e.g., Delaware Bay, have turnover times of months and years. Some systems, Marennes-Oléron, South San Francisco Bay and North Inlet, require a net influx of phytoplankton in order to support their bivalve populations. Three systems, Carlingford Lough, Chesapeake Bay and Delaware Bay, have very long bivalve clearance times due to small or reduced bivalve filter feeder populations. Carlingford Lough stands out because it is a naturally planktonic system now being converted to bivalve culture with an adherently stronger benthic-pelagic coupling. Existing models of bivalve carrying capacity are reviewed. The Herman model is utilized as an appropriate ecosystem level model to examine carrying capacity because it includes the three major turnover time elements of water mass residence time, primary production time and bivalve filter feeder clearance time. The graphical analysis suggests that massive and successful bivalve filter feeder populations are found in systems with relatively short residence times (
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)409-421
JournalAquatic Ecology
StatePublished - 1998

ID: 119850