Working memory accuracy for multiple targets is driven by reward expectation and stimulus contrast with different time-courses

P Christiaan Klink, Danique Jeurissen, Jan Theeuwes, D. Denys, Pieter R Roelfsema

Research output: Contribution to journal/periodicalArticleScientificpeer-review

29 Citations (Scopus)
436 Downloads (Pure)


The richness of sensory input dictates that the brain must prioritize and select information for further processing and storage in working memory. Stimulus salience and reward expectations influence this prioritization but their relative contributions and underlying mechanisms are poorly understood. Here we investigate how the quality of working memory for multiple stimuli is determined by priority during encoding and later memory phases. Selective attention could, for instance, act as the primary gating mechanism when stimuli are still visible. Alternatively, observers might still be able to shift priorities across memories during maintenance or retrieval. To distinguish between these possibilities, we investigated how and when reward cues determine working memory accuracy and found that they were only effective during memory encoding. Previously learned, but currently non-predictive, color-reward associations had a similar influence, which gradually weakened without reinforcement. Finally, we show that bottom-up salience, manipulated through varying stimulus contrast, influences memory accuracy during encoding with a fundamentally different time-course than top-down reward cues. While reward-based effects required long stimulus presentation, the influence of contrast was strongest with brief presentations. Our results demonstrate how memory resources are distributed over memory targets and implicates selective attention as a main gating mechanism between sensory and memory systems.

Original languageEnglish
Article number9082
JournalScientific Reports
Issue number1
Publication statusPublished - 12 Aug 2017


  • Journal Article


Dive into the research topics of 'Working memory accuracy for multiple targets is driven by reward expectation and stimulus contrast with different time-courses'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this