Clausal ellipsis: Deletion of selective spell-out?

Hans Broekhuis; Josef Bayer

doi:10.1075/avt.00035.bro

Clausal ellipsis: Deletion of selective spell-out?

Meertens Instituut - Variatielinguïstiek

Onderzoeksoutput: Bijdrage aan wetenschappelijk tijdschrift/periodieke uitgave › Artikel › Wetenschappelijk › peer review

3 Citaten (Scopus)

129 Downloads (Pure)

Samenvatting

This article compares two alternatives to the standard movement-and-deletion approach to clausal ellipsis, which postulates deletion of TP after the remnants of ellipsis are (sometimes exceptionally) A'-moved into the left periphery of the clause. One alternative is the in-situ approach, which denies the involvement of movement in the derivation of clausal ellipsis; it claims that clausal ellipsis can apply to any run-of-the-mill syntactic structure and simply deletes the familiar/given information from the propositional domain of the clause. Another alternative is the selective spell-out approach; it denies the involvement of deletion and states that the remnants undergo regular A'-movement into the specifiers of specific semantically relevant functional projections (CP, FocusP, NegP, etc.), which are subsequently selected for spell-out. This article argues that the selective spell-out approach is superior to the two deletion approaches.

Originele taal-2	Engels
Tijdschrift	Linguistics in the Netherlands
DOI's	https://doi.org/10.1075/avt.00035.bro
Status	Gepubliceerd - okt. 2020

Toegang tot document

10.1075/avt.00035.bro

Broekhuis&Bauer_Calausal ellipsisAccepted author manuscript, 322 KB

Citeer dit

@article{f75ad44185624b17aef5bbf0c8d704dd,

title = "Clausal ellipsis: Deletion of selective spell-out?",

abstract = "This article compares two alternatives to the standard movement-and-deletion approach to clausal ellipsis, which postulates deletion of TP after the remnants of ellipsis are (sometimes exceptionally) A'-moved into the left periphery of the clause. One alternative is the in-situ approach, which denies the involvement of movement in the derivation of clausal ellipsis; it claims that clausal ellipsis can apply to any run-of-the-mill syntactic structure and simply deletes the familiar/given information from the propositional domain of the clause. Another alternative is the selective spell-out approach; it denies the involvement of deletion and states that the remnants undergo regular A'-movement into the specifiers of specific semantically relevant functional projections (CP, FocusP, NegP, etc.), which are subsequently selected for spell-out. This article argues that the selective spell-out approach is superior to the two deletion approaches.",

keywords = "ellpsis, sluiding, gapping, discourse particle",

author = "Hans Broekhuis and Josef Bayer",

year = "2020",

month = oct,

doi = "10.1075/avt.00035.bro",

language = "English",

journal = "Linguistics in the Netherlands",

issn = "0929-7332",

publisher = "John Benjamins Publishing",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Clausal ellipsis

T2 - Deletion of selective spell-out?

AU - Broekhuis, Hans

AU - Bayer, Josef

PY - 2020/10

Y1 - 2020/10

N2 - This article compares two alternatives to the standard movement-and-deletion approach to clausal ellipsis, which postulates deletion of TP after the remnants of ellipsis are (sometimes exceptionally) A'-moved into the left periphery of the clause. One alternative is the in-situ approach, which denies the involvement of movement in the derivation of clausal ellipsis; it claims that clausal ellipsis can apply to any run-of-the-mill syntactic structure and simply deletes the familiar/given information from the propositional domain of the clause. Another alternative is the selective spell-out approach; it denies the involvement of deletion and states that the remnants undergo regular A'-movement into the specifiers of specific semantically relevant functional projections (CP, FocusP, NegP, etc.), which are subsequently selected for spell-out. This article argues that the selective spell-out approach is superior to the two deletion approaches.

AB - This article compares two alternatives to the standard movement-and-deletion approach to clausal ellipsis, which postulates deletion of TP after the remnants of ellipsis are (sometimes exceptionally) A'-moved into the left periphery of the clause. One alternative is the in-situ approach, which denies the involvement of movement in the derivation of clausal ellipsis; it claims that clausal ellipsis can apply to any run-of-the-mill syntactic structure and simply deletes the familiar/given information from the propositional domain of the clause. Another alternative is the selective spell-out approach; it denies the involvement of deletion and states that the remnants undergo regular A'-movement into the specifiers of specific semantically relevant functional projections (CP, FocusP, NegP, etc.), which are subsequently selected for spell-out. This article argues that the selective spell-out approach is superior to the two deletion approaches.

KW - ellpsis

KW - sluiding

KW - gapping

KW - discourse particle

U2 - 10.1075/avt.00035.bro

DO - 10.1075/avt.00035.bro

M3 - Article

SN - 0929-7332

JO - Linguistics in the Netherlands

JF - Linguistics in the Netherlands

ER -

Clausal ellipsis: Deletion of selective spell-out?

Samenvatting

Toegang tot document

Vingerafdruk

Citeer dit