Clausal ellipsis: Deletion of selective spell-out?

Hans Broekhuis, Josef Bayer

Onderzoeksoutput: Bijdrage aan wetenschappelijk tijdschrift/periodieke uitgaveArtikelWetenschappelijkpeer review

2 Citaten (Scopus)
75 Downloads (Pure)


This article compares two alternatives to the standard movement-and-deletion approach to clausal ellipsis, which postulates deletion of TP after the remnants of ellipsis are (sometimes exceptionally) A'-moved into the left periphery of the clause. One alternative is the in-situ approach, which denies the involvement of movement in the derivation of clausal ellipsis; it claims that clausal ellipsis can apply to any run-of-the-mill syntactic structure and simply deletes the familiar/given information from the propositional domain of the clause. Another alternative is the selective spell-out approach; it denies the involvement of deletion and states that the remnants undergo regular A'-movement into the specifiers of specific semantically relevant functional projections (CP, FocusP, NegP, etc.), which are subsequently selected for spell-out. This article argues that the selective spell-out approach is superior to the two deletion approaches.
Originele taal-2Engels
TijdschriftLinguistics in the Netherlands
StatusGepubliceerd - okt. 2020


Duik in de onderzoeksthema's van 'Clausal ellipsis: Deletion of selective spell-out?'. Samen vormen ze een unieke vingerafdruk.

Citeer dit