TY - JOUR
T1 - Comparing the nativeness vs. intelligibility approach in prosody instruction for developing speaking skills by interpreter trainees
T2 - An experimental study
AU - Yenkimaleki, Mahmood
AU - van Heuven, Vincent J.
N1 - Funding Information:
We would like to thank all the students and colleagues who collaborated with us in this study.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2022 Elsevier B.V.
PY - 2022/2
Y1 - 2022/2
N2 - The present study investigates the relative contribution of the Nativeness vs. Intelligibility approach in prosody instruction for developing English speaking skills by Iranian interpreter trainees. Three groups of student interpreters were formed. Participants were assigned to groups at random. The speaking skill pretest scores revealed that the three groups were homogeneous before starting the training program. The Control group listened to authentic audio tracks in English, and discussed their contents, watched authentic English movies, and did exercises to improve speaking skills without receiving prosody training. The Nativeness approach group instead spent part of the time on the theoretical explanation of, and practical exercises in, English prosody with the overall aim to train students to acquire native-like speaking skills. The Intelligibility approach group spent part of the time on the theoretical explanation of, and practical exercises in, English prosody emphasizing the requirement that students produce intelligible speech. The total instruction time was the same for all three groups, i.e., 18 h. Students then took a posttest in speaking skills. The results show that both experimental groups performed better than the control group. Moreover, the Intelligibility approach group outperformed the Nativeness approach group in developing speaking skills.
AB - The present study investigates the relative contribution of the Nativeness vs. Intelligibility approach in prosody instruction for developing English speaking skills by Iranian interpreter trainees. Three groups of student interpreters were formed. Participants were assigned to groups at random. The speaking skill pretest scores revealed that the three groups were homogeneous before starting the training program. The Control group listened to authentic audio tracks in English, and discussed their contents, watched authentic English movies, and did exercises to improve speaking skills without receiving prosody training. The Nativeness approach group instead spent part of the time on the theoretical explanation of, and practical exercises in, English prosody with the overall aim to train students to acquire native-like speaking skills. The Intelligibility approach group spent part of the time on the theoretical explanation of, and practical exercises in, English prosody emphasizing the requirement that students produce intelligible speech. The total instruction time was the same for all three groups, i.e., 18 h. Students then took a posttest in speaking skills. The results show that both experimental groups performed better than the control group. Moreover, the Intelligibility approach group outperformed the Nativeness approach group in developing speaking skills.
KW - Intelligibility approach
KW - Nativeness approach
KW - Prosody instruction
KW - Speaking skills
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85123696186&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.specom.2022.01.007
DO - 10.1016/j.specom.2022.01.007
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85123696186
SN - 0167-6393
VL - 137
SP - 92
EP - 102
JO - Speech Communication
JF - Speech Communication
ER -