Ecological resilience in lakes and the conjunction fallacy

Bryan M. Spears (Co-auteur), Martyn N. Futter, Erik Jeppesen, Brian J. Huser, Stephen C. Ives, Thomas A. Davidson, Rita Adrian, David G. Angeler, Sarah J. Burthe, Laurence Carvalho, Francis Daunt, Alena S. Gsell, Dag O. Hessen, Annette B. G. Janssen, Eleanor B. Mackay, Linda May, Heather Moorhouse, Saara Olsen, Martin Søndergaard, Helen J. WoodsStephen J. Thackeray

Onderzoeksoutput: Bijdrage aan wetenschappelijk tijdschrift/periodieke uitgaveArtikelWetenschappelijkpeer review

Samenvatting

There is a pressing need to apply stability and resilience theory to environmental management to restore degraded ecosystems effectively and to mitigate the effects of impending environmental change. Lakes represent excellent model case studies in this respect and have been used widely to demonstrate theories of ecological stability and resilience that are needed to underpin preventative management approaches. However, we argue that this approach is not yet fully developed because the pursuit of empirical evidence to underpin such theoretically grounded management continues in the absence of an objective probability framework. This has blurred the lines between intuitive logic (based on the elementary principles of probability) and extensional logic (based on assumption and belief) in this field.
Originele taal-2Engels
Pagina's (van-tot)1616-1624
TijdschriftNature Ecology and Evolution
Volume1
Vroegere onlinedatum16 okt 2017
DOI's
StatusGepubliceerd - 2017

Vingerafdruk Duik in de onderzoeksthema's van 'Ecological resilience in lakes and the conjunction fallacy'. Samen vormen ze een unieke vingerafdruk.

Citeer dit