Generalism in Nature ... The Great Misnomer: Aphids and Wasp Parasitoids as Examples

Hugh D. Loxdale (Co-auteur), Adalbert Balog, Jeffrey A. Harvey

Onderzoeksoutput: Bijdrage aan wetenschappelijk tijdschrift/periodieke uitgaveArtikelWetenschappelijkpeer review

13 Citaten (Scopus)
79 Downloads (Pure)


In the present article we discuss why, in our view, the term ‘generalism’ to define the dietary breadth of a species is a misnomer and should be revised by entomologists/ecologists with the more exact title relating to the animal in question’s level of phagy—mono-, oligo, or polyphagy. We discard generalism as a concept because of the indisputable fact that all living organisms fill a unique ecological niche, and that entry and exit from such niches are the acknowledged routes and mechanisms driving ecological divergence and ultimately speciation. The term specialist is probably still useful and we support its continuing usage simply because all species and lower levels of evolutionary diverge are indeed specialists to a large degree. Using aphids and parasitoid wasps as examples, we provide evidence from the literature that even some apparently highly polyphagous agricultural aphid pest species and their wasp parasitoids are probably not as polyphagous as formerly assumed. We suggest that the shifting of plant hosts by herbivorous insects like aphids, whilst having positive benefits in reducing competition, and reducing antagonists by moving the target organism into ‘enemy free space’, produces trade-offs in survival, involving relaxed selection in the case of the manicured agro-ecosystem.
Originele taal-2Engels
StatusGepubliceerd - okt. 2019


Duik in de onderzoeksthema's van 'Generalism in Nature ... The Great Misnomer: Aphids and Wasp Parasitoids as Examples'. Samen vormen ze een unieke vingerafdruk.

Citeer dit