Neurobiology in public and private discourse: the case of adults with ADHD

Christian Bröer, Marjolijn Heerings, M. Heerings

Onderzoeksoutput: Bijdrage aan wetenschappelijk tijdschrift/periodieke uitgaveArtikelWetenschappelijkpeer review

46 Citaten (Scopus)


How do people describe their health? How do their descriptions relate to public definitions? This article focuses on adult attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). We look at Dutch adults who adopt the ADHD label and ask: which discourses structure their descriptions of ADHD? How do these relate to the dominant public discourse on ADHD? Do people use, for example, neurobiological explanations of ADHD? The research makes use of Q-methodology, which combines a discursive relational approach with factor analysis. We examine five different personal discourses that partly differ from the public discourse. People borrow neurobiological, psychological, sociological and even holistic arguments from public discourse to come up with a distinct set of discourses. Neurobiology resonates among adults with ADHD but does not dominate their thinking. Contrary to our expectation, this supports reflexivity instead of discipline theory.

Originele taal-2Engels
Pagina's (van-tot)49-65
Aantal pagina's17
TijdschriftSociology of Health and Illness
Nummer van het tijdschrift1
StatusGepubliceerd - jan. 2013


Duik in de onderzoeksthema's van 'Neurobiology in public and private discourse: the case of adults with ADHD'. Samen vormen ze een unieke vingerafdruk.

Citeer dit