Same data—different results? Towards a comparative approach to the identification of thematic structures in science: Introduction to the special issue

Jochen Gläser, W. Glänzel, A.M. Scharnhorst

Onderzoeksoutput: Bijdrage aan wetenschappelijk tijdschrift/periodieke uitgaveArtikelWetenschappelijkpeer review

225 Downloads (Pure)

Samenvatting

Science studies are persistently challenged by the elusive structures of their subject matter, be it scientific knowledge or the various collectivities of researchers engaged with its production. Bibliometrics has responded by developing a strong and growing structural bibliometrics, which is concerned with delineating fields and identifying thematic structures. In the course of these developments, a concern emerged and is steadily growing. Do the sets of publications, authors or institutions we identify and visualise with our methods indeed represent thematic structures? To what extent are results of topic identification exercises determined by properties of knowledge structures, and to what extent are they determined by the approaches we use? Do we produce more than artefacts? These questions triggered the collective process of comparative topic identification reported in this special issue. The introduction traces the history of bibliometric approaches to topic identification, identifies the major challenges involved in these exercises, and introduces the contributions to the special issue.
Originele taal-2Engels
Pagina's (van-tot)981–998
TijdschriftScientometrics
Volume111
Nummer van het tijdschrift2
StatusGepubliceerd - 2017

Vingerafdruk Duik in de onderzoeksthema's van 'Same data—different results? Towards a comparative approach to the identification of thematic structures in science: Introduction to the special issue'. Samen vormen ze een unieke vingerafdruk.

Citeer dit