Sara Burgerhart et Marianne de La Prise. Réponse à Paul Pelckmans

S. van Dijk; W.R.D. van Oostrum

Sara Burgerhart et Marianne de La Prise. Réponse à Paul Pelckmans

S. van Dijk, W.R.D. van Oostrum

Huygens ING - Letterkunde

Onderzoeksoutput: Bijdrage aan wetenschappelijk tijdschrift/periodieke uitgave › Artikel › Wetenschappelijk › peer review

Samenvatting

In this contribution the authors engage in a discussion with Paul Pelckmans about the question if Isabelle de Charrière’s Lettres neuchâteloises (1784) have been, as she herself claimed in 1804, influenced by Betje Wolff and Aagje Deken’s Historie van Mejuffrouw Sara Burgerhart (1782). They tend to insist upon the use, in both novels, of narrative topoi about female solidarity and mutual help, which are not commonly found in contemporary novels written by men, and which have been surprisingly overlooked both in “traditional” and in more recent research concerning Wolff and Deken’s authorship.

Originele taal-2	Frans
Pagina's (van-tot)	79-87
Aantal pagina's	116
Tijdschrift	Cahiers Isabelle de Charrière / Belle de Zuylen Papers
Volume	6
Status	Gepubliceerd - 2011

Citeer dit

@article{9fd0997780ef4b55a37b021ded38e497,

title = "Sara Burgerhart et Marianne de La Prise. R{\'e}ponse {\`a} Paul Pelckmans",

abstract = "In this contribution the authors engage in a discussion with Paul Pelckmans about the question if Isabelle de Charri{\`e}re{\textquoteright}s Lettres neuch{\^a}teloises (1784) have been, as she herself claimed in 1804, influenced by Betje Wolff and Aagje Deken{\textquoteright}s Historie van Mejuffrouw Sara Burgerhart (1782). They tend to insist upon the use, in both novels, of narrative topoi about female solidarity and mutual help, which are not commonly found in contemporary novels written by men, and which have been surprisingly overlooked both in “traditional” and in more recent research concerning Wolff and Deken{\textquoteright}s authorship.",

author = "{van Dijk}, S. and {van Oostrum}, W.R.D.",

note = "Reporting year: 2011",

year = "2011",

language = "Frans",

volume = "6",

pages = "79--87",

journal = "Cahiers Isabelle de Charri{\`e}re / Belle de Zuylen Papers",

issn = "1872-7832",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Sara Burgerhart et Marianne de La Prise. Réponse à Paul Pelckmans

AU - van Dijk, S.

AU - van Oostrum, W.R.D.

N1 - Reporting year: 2011

PY - 2011

Y1 - 2011

N2 - In this contribution the authors engage in a discussion with Paul Pelckmans about the question if Isabelle de Charrière’s Lettres neuchâteloises (1784) have been, as she herself claimed in 1804, influenced by Betje Wolff and Aagje Deken’s Historie van Mejuffrouw Sara Burgerhart (1782). They tend to insist upon the use, in both novels, of narrative topoi about female solidarity and mutual help, which are not commonly found in contemporary novels written by men, and which have been surprisingly overlooked both in “traditional” and in more recent research concerning Wolff and Deken’s authorship.

AB - In this contribution the authors engage in a discussion with Paul Pelckmans about the question if Isabelle de Charrière’s Lettres neuchâteloises (1784) have been, as she herself claimed in 1804, influenced by Betje Wolff and Aagje Deken’s Historie van Mejuffrouw Sara Burgerhart (1782). They tend to insist upon the use, in both novels, of narrative topoi about female solidarity and mutual help, which are not commonly found in contemporary novels written by men, and which have been surprisingly overlooked both in “traditional” and in more recent research concerning Wolff and Deken’s authorship.

M3 - Artikel

SN - 1872-7832

VL - 6

SP - 79

EP - 87

JO - Cahiers Isabelle de Charrière / Belle de Zuylen Papers

JF - Cahiers Isabelle de Charrière / Belle de Zuylen Papers

ER -