TY - JOUR
T1 - Spatial variation in ditch bank plant species composition at the regional level: the role of environment and dispersal
AU - Leng, X.
AU - Musters, C. J. M.
AU - de Snoo, G. R.
N1 - ISI Document Delivery No.: 646OD Times Cited: 13 Cited Reference Count: 42 Leng, Xin Musters, C. J. M. de Snoo, Geert R. de Snoo, geert/M-4315-2013; Musters, Cornelis/K-7828-2013 Chinese Scholarship Council (CSC)China Scholarship Council We thank Sarah Goslee for help with programming issues, Jeff Nekola for support with data analysis and Ben A. van Arkel and Xiaofei Zhang for assistance with data collection. We are grateful to Rudi Terlouw and Dick Kerkhof of the Zuid-Hollands Land-schap for providing data. We also thank Nigel Harle for improving the English of this article. This research was financially supported by the Chinese Scholarship Council (CSC). 14 1 31 Wiley-blackwell publishing, inc Malden
<Go to ISI>://WOS:000281551000006
PY - 2010
Y1 - 2010
N2 - Questions Can patterns of species similarity on ditch banks be explained by environmental and dispersal factors and, if so, to what extent? Does the pattern of distance decay differ among different species groups (all species versus target species of conservation interest; species of different dispersal type)? Location Krimpenerwaard, the Netherlands. Methods In 2006-2007, ditch bank vegetation data on 130 terrestrial herbaceous species were collected on 72 plots. Species similarity was measured and related to environmental distance (soil type and nutrient level) and dispersal distance (geographic distance and limitation of dispersal by water, wind and agricultural activities) as explanatory factors using multiple regression on distance matrices (MRM). Differences in rates of distance decay in species similarity among different subsets of data (species groups) were investigated using randomization tests. Results In all species, patterns of similarity of composition are influenced mainly by variations in dispersal, while for target species these are due to combined effects of environmental and dispersal variation. Compared with species using other dispersal mechanisms, water-dispersed species had half the rate of distance decay. Conclusions For all species considered here, dispersal limitation seems more responsible for the spatial variation in species composition than environmental determinism. Conservation management focused on plant species diversity would be more successful in areas adjacent to those where a similar management regime is already in force. For target species of conservation interest, besides dispersal limitation, environmental determinants like nutrient level are also important. As a means of conserving such target species, therefore, focusing on reducing nutrient levels and facilitating species dispersal will be more effective than current management practices, which mainly focus on reducing fertilizer inputs.
AB - Questions Can patterns of species similarity on ditch banks be explained by environmental and dispersal factors and, if so, to what extent? Does the pattern of distance decay differ among different species groups (all species versus target species of conservation interest; species of different dispersal type)? Location Krimpenerwaard, the Netherlands. Methods In 2006-2007, ditch bank vegetation data on 130 terrestrial herbaceous species were collected on 72 plots. Species similarity was measured and related to environmental distance (soil type and nutrient level) and dispersal distance (geographic distance and limitation of dispersal by water, wind and agricultural activities) as explanatory factors using multiple regression on distance matrices (MRM). Differences in rates of distance decay in species similarity among different subsets of data (species groups) were investigated using randomization tests. Results In all species, patterns of similarity of composition are influenced mainly by variations in dispersal, while for target species these are due to combined effects of environmental and dispersal variation. Compared with species using other dispersal mechanisms, water-dispersed species had half the rate of distance decay. Conclusions For all species considered here, dispersal limitation seems more responsible for the spatial variation in species composition than environmental determinism. Conservation management focused on plant species diversity would be more successful in areas adjacent to those where a similar management regime is already in force. For target species of conservation interest, besides dispersal limitation, environmental determinants like nutrient level are also important. As a means of conserving such target species, therefore, focusing on reducing nutrient levels and facilitating species dispersal will be more effective than current management practices, which mainly focus on reducing fertilizer inputs.
KW - Agricultural activities Dispersal type Environmental distance Geographic distance Limitation of long-distance dispersal vectors MRM Target species of conservation interest seed dispersal beta-diversity similarity distance conservation patterns ecology com
U2 - 10.1111/j.1654-1103.2010.01190.x
DO - 10.1111/j.1654-1103.2010.01190.x
M3 - Article
SN - 1100-9233
VL - 21
SP - 868
EP - 875
JO - Journal of Vegetation Science
JF - Journal of Vegetation Science
IS - 5
ER -