Straylight Measurements in Two Different Apodized Diffractive Multifocal Intraocular Lenses

Ruth Lapid-Gortzak; Grzegorz Labuz; Ivanka J van der Meulen; Jan Willem van der Linden; M P Mourits; Tom J van den Berg

doi:10.3928/1081597X-20151021-03

Straylight Measurements in Two Different Apodized Diffractive Multifocal Intraocular Lenses

Ruth Lapid-Gortzak, Grzegorz Labuz, Ivanka J van der Meulen, Jan Willem van der Linden, M P Mourits, Tom J van den Berg

NIN

Onderzoeksoutput: Bijdrage aan wetenschappelijk tijdschrift/periodieke uitgave › Artikel › Wetenschappelijk › peer review

6 Citaten (Scopus)

269 Downloads (Pure)

Samenvatting

PURPOSE: To evaluate differences in straylight between eyes implanted with a hydrophilic multifocal IOL (Seelens MF; Hanita Lenses, Hanita, Israel) and a hydrophobic multifocal IOL (SN6AD1; Alcon Laboratories, Inc., Fort Worth, TX).

METHODS: In a prospective cohort study, routinely obtained straylight measurements (C-Quant; Oculus Optikgeräte, Wetzlar, Germany) 3 months after standard phacoemulsification for either cataract or refractive lens procedures were compared. Patients were implanted with either the SeeLens MF IOL or the SN6AD1 IOL. Postoperative straylight values, visual acuity, and refractive outcomes were compared.

RESULTS: The SeeLens MF IOL was implanted in 84 eyes and the SN6AD1 IOL in 79 eyes. The difference in straylight was 0.08 (P = .01), with the SeeLens MF IOL having less straylight. Postoperative CDVA was logMAR -0.03 ± 0.06 in the SeeLens MF group, and logMAR -0.02 ± 0.08 in the SN6AD1 group. Mean postoperative refraction was +0.01 ± 0.43 and +0.06 ± 0.35 D, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS: The Seelens MF IOL showed a stray-light of log(s) 0.08 lower than the SN6AD1 IOL. In terms of spherical equivalent and visual acuity the lenses performed equally. More study will aid in understanding the causes and clinical impact of this difference. [J Refract Surg. 2015;31(11):746-751.].

Originele taal-2	Engels
Pagina's (van-tot)	746-51
Aantal pagina's	6
Tijdschrift	Journal of refractive surgery (Thorofare, N.J. : 1995)
Volume	31
Nummer van het tijdschrift	11
DOI's	https://doi.org/10.3928/1081597X-20151021-03
Status	Gepubliceerd - 01 nov. 2015

Toegang tot document

10.3928/1081597X-20151021-03

Lapid2015Final published version, 143 KB

Citeer dit

@article{578a5e8a4a6d423d91b49ecb6fcf7f3d,

title = "Straylight Measurements in Two Different Apodized Diffractive Multifocal Intraocular Lenses",

abstract = "PURPOSE: To evaluate differences in straylight between eyes implanted with a hydrophilic multifocal IOL (Seelens MF; Hanita Lenses, Hanita, Israel) and a hydrophobic multifocal IOL (SN6AD1; Alcon Laboratories, Inc., Fort Worth, TX).METHODS: In a prospective cohort study, routinely obtained straylight measurements (C-Quant; Oculus Optikger{\"a}te, Wetzlar, Germany) 3 months after standard phacoemulsification for either cataract or refractive lens procedures were compared. Patients were implanted with either the SeeLens MF IOL or the SN6AD1 IOL. Postoperative straylight values, visual acuity, and refractive outcomes were compared.RESULTS: The SeeLens MF IOL was implanted in 84 eyes and the SN6AD1 IOL in 79 eyes. The difference in straylight was 0.08 (P = .01), with the SeeLens MF IOL having less straylight. Postoperative CDVA was logMAR -0.03 ± 0.06 in the SeeLens MF group, and logMAR -0.02 ± 0.08 in the SN6AD1 group. Mean postoperative refraction was +0.01 ± 0.43 and +0.06 ± 0.35 D, respectively.CONCLUSIONS: The Seelens MF IOL showed a stray-light of log(s) 0.08 lower than the SN6AD1 IOL. In terms of spherical equivalent and visual acuity the lenses performed equally. More study will aid in understanding the causes and clinical impact of this difference. [J Refract Surg. 2015;31(11):746-751.].",

author = "Ruth Lapid-Gortzak and Grzegorz Labuz and {van der Meulen}, {Ivanka J} and {van der Linden}, {Jan Willem} and Mourits, {M P} and {van den Berg}, {Tom J}",

year = "2015",

month = nov,

day = "1",

doi = "10.3928/1081597X-20151021-03",

language = "English",

volume = "31",

pages = "746--51",

journal = "Journal of refractive surgery (Thorofare, N.J. : 1995)",

issn = "1081-597X",

publisher = "Slack Incorporated",

number = "11",

}

Straylight Measurements in Two Different Apodized Diffractive Multifocal Intraocular Lenses. / Lapid-Gortzak, Ruth; Labuz, Grzegorz; van der Meulen, Ivanka J et al.
In: Journal of refractive surgery (Thorofare, N.J. : 1995), Vol. 31, Nr. 11, 01.11.2015, blz. 746-51.

Onderzoeksoutput: Bijdrage aan wetenschappelijk tijdschrift/periodieke uitgave › Artikel › Wetenschappelijk › peer review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Straylight Measurements in Two Different Apodized Diffractive Multifocal Intraocular Lenses

AU - Lapid-Gortzak, Ruth

AU - Labuz, Grzegorz

AU - van der Meulen, Ivanka J

AU - van der Linden, Jan Willem

AU - Mourits, M P

AU - van den Berg, Tom J

PY - 2015/11/1

Y1 - 2015/11/1

N2 - PURPOSE: To evaluate differences in straylight between eyes implanted with a hydrophilic multifocal IOL (Seelens MF; Hanita Lenses, Hanita, Israel) and a hydrophobic multifocal IOL (SN6AD1; Alcon Laboratories, Inc., Fort Worth, TX).METHODS: In a prospective cohort study, routinely obtained straylight measurements (C-Quant; Oculus Optikgeräte, Wetzlar, Germany) 3 months after standard phacoemulsification for either cataract or refractive lens procedures were compared. Patients were implanted with either the SeeLens MF IOL or the SN6AD1 IOL. Postoperative straylight values, visual acuity, and refractive outcomes were compared.RESULTS: The SeeLens MF IOL was implanted in 84 eyes and the SN6AD1 IOL in 79 eyes. The difference in straylight was 0.08 (P = .01), with the SeeLens MF IOL having less straylight. Postoperative CDVA was logMAR -0.03 ± 0.06 in the SeeLens MF group, and logMAR -0.02 ± 0.08 in the SN6AD1 group. Mean postoperative refraction was +0.01 ± 0.43 and +0.06 ± 0.35 D, respectively.CONCLUSIONS: The Seelens MF IOL showed a stray-light of log(s) 0.08 lower than the SN6AD1 IOL. In terms of spherical equivalent and visual acuity the lenses performed equally. More study will aid in understanding the causes and clinical impact of this difference. [J Refract Surg. 2015;31(11):746-751.].

AB - PURPOSE: To evaluate differences in straylight between eyes implanted with a hydrophilic multifocal IOL (Seelens MF; Hanita Lenses, Hanita, Israel) and a hydrophobic multifocal IOL (SN6AD1; Alcon Laboratories, Inc., Fort Worth, TX).METHODS: In a prospective cohort study, routinely obtained straylight measurements (C-Quant; Oculus Optikgeräte, Wetzlar, Germany) 3 months after standard phacoemulsification for either cataract or refractive lens procedures were compared. Patients were implanted with either the SeeLens MF IOL or the SN6AD1 IOL. Postoperative straylight values, visual acuity, and refractive outcomes were compared.RESULTS: The SeeLens MF IOL was implanted in 84 eyes and the SN6AD1 IOL in 79 eyes. The difference in straylight was 0.08 (P = .01), with the SeeLens MF IOL having less straylight. Postoperative CDVA was logMAR -0.03 ± 0.06 in the SeeLens MF group, and logMAR -0.02 ± 0.08 in the SN6AD1 group. Mean postoperative refraction was +0.01 ± 0.43 and +0.06 ± 0.35 D, respectively.CONCLUSIONS: The Seelens MF IOL showed a stray-light of log(s) 0.08 lower than the SN6AD1 IOL. In terms of spherical equivalent and visual acuity the lenses performed equally. More study will aid in understanding the causes and clinical impact of this difference. [J Refract Surg. 2015;31(11):746-751.].

U2 - 10.3928/1081597X-20151021-03

DO - 10.3928/1081597X-20151021-03

M3 - Article

C2 - 26544562

SN - 1081-597X

VL - 31

SP - 746

EP - 751

JO - Journal of refractive surgery (Thorofare, N.J. : 1995)

JF - Journal of refractive surgery (Thorofare, N.J. : 1995)

IS - 11

ER -

Straylight Measurements in Two Different Apodized Diffractive Multifocal Intraocular Lenses

Samenvatting

Toegang tot document

Vingerafdruk

Citeer dit