Teachers-in-Training and the Policing of Language Variation

Jos Swanenberg*, Anne Kerkhoff, Petra Poelmans

*Bijbehorende auteur voor dit werk

Onderzoeksoutput: Hoofdstuk in boek/boekdeelHoofdstukWetenschappelijkpeer review


In the domains of education and labor, we may expect to be assessed on competences and capacities. Alas, stereotyping and prejudice hinder this for people from peripheral areas and marginalized groups. One of the important factors in this is their language. Why does speaking with an accent diminish one’s opportunities in the job market or the achievements in one’s school career? Why are some accents better than other accents? In a pilot study at a teacher training college we addressed the question if future teachers of Dutch may or may not speak with an accent in the class room. Apparently, speaking with an accent will be tolerated by future teachers of Dutch, but it depends on which accent one uses. Indigenous accents are evaluated more positively than foreign accents, especially those we associate with labor migration. Although diversity in the pronunciation of Dutch may have increased, the social acceptance of accents is quite selective. Adolescents have to deal with stigmatized representations when people hear and assess their accents. Tolerance towards speaking with an accent is limited, and this may damage the position of young people from the countryside and specific ethnic groups.

Originele taal-2Engels
TitelLanguage Policy(Netherlands)
UitgeverijSpringer Nature
Aantal pagina's19
StatusGepubliceerd - 2021

Publicatie series

NaamLanguage Policy(Netherlands)
ISSN van geprinte versie1571-5361


Duik in de onderzoeksthema's van 'Teachers-in-Training and the Policing of Language Variation'. Samen vormen ze een unieke vingerafdruk.

Citeer dit