Towards open, reliable, and transparent ecology and evolutionary biology

Rose E. O’Dea* (Co-auteur), Timothy H. Parker, Yung En Chee, Antica Culina, Szymon M. Drobniak, David H. Duncan, Fiona Fidler, Elliot Gould, Malika Ihle, Clint D. Kelly, Malgorzata Lagisz, Dominique G. Roche, Alfredo Sánchez-Tójar, David P. Wilkinson, Bonnie C. Wintle, Shinichi Nakagawa

*Bijbehorende auteur voor dit werk

Onderzoeksoutput: Bijdrage aan wetenschappelijk tijdschrift/periodieke uitgaveArtikelWetenschappelijkpeer review

35 Citaten (Scopus)
35 Downloads (Pure)


Unreliable research programmes waste funds, time, and even the lives of the organisms we seek to help and understand. Reducing this waste and increasing the value of scientific evidence require changing the actions of both individual researchers and the institutions they depend on for employment and promotion. While ecologists and evolutionary biologists have somewhat improved research transparency over the past decade (e.g. more data sharing), major obstacles remain. In this commentary, we lift our gaze to the horizon to imagine how researchers and institutions can clear the path towards more credible and effective research programmes.

Originele taal-2Engels
TijdschriftBMC Biology
Nummer van het tijdschrift1
StatusGepubliceerd - dec. 2021


Duik in de onderzoeksthema's van 'Towards open, reliable, and transparent ecology and evolutionary biology'. Samen vormen ze een unieke vingerafdruk.

Citeer dit