What's in it for Me? Motivational Differences between Farmers' Subsidised and Non-Subsidised Conservation Practices

A. M. Lokhorst, H. Staats, J. van Dijk, E. van Dijk, G.R. de Snoo

Onderzoeksoutput: Bijdrage aan wetenschappelijk tijdschrift/periodieke uitgaveArtikelWetenschappelijkpeer review

Samenvatting

Through nature conservation practices, farmers can strongly enhance nature quality and biodiversity in rural areas. In this paper, the social psychological underpinnings of farmers' nature conservation practices are investigated using the Theory of Planned Behavior, to which the concepts of self-identity and personal norms were added. A distinction is made between nature conservation practices done on a non-subsidised basis and nature conservation practices for which farmers receive some form of remuneration from the Dutch government. Eighty-five arable farmers participated in our survey. Results show that our model explains more variance in the intention to perform non-subsidised than subsidised nature conservation practices. Also, the concepts of self-identity and personal norms appear to be related to the intention to perform non-subsidised, not subsidised conservation.
Originele taal-2Engels
Pagina's (van-tot)337-353
Aantal pagina's17
TijdschriftApplied Psychology-an International Review-Psychologie Appliquee-Revue Internationale
Volume60
Nummer van het tijdschrift3
DOI's
StatusGepubliceerd - 2011
Extern gepubliceerdJa

Vingerafdruk Duik in de onderzoeksthema's van 'What's in it for Me? Motivational Differences between Farmers' Subsidised and Non-Subsidised Conservation Practices'. Samen vormen ze een unieke vingerafdruk.

Citeer dit